2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 75249
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.VIJAYAKUMAR
PERIYAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
INDIRANI – Respondent
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 27.06.2023 PRONOUNCED ON : 12.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR C.M.S.A(MD)Nos.37 of 2015 & 11 of 2023 and MP(MD).No. 1 of 2015 & CMP(MD).No.7677 of 2023 CMSA(MD).No.37 of 2015
1.Periyammal
2.Valliammal .....Appellants Vs.
1.Indirani
2.K.Babu@Shanthi
3.K.Latha
4.Meena @ Jeyanthi
5.Kamalammal
6.R.Rasu Servai
7.Pandi Servai
-8.Manangathan
9.Pappa
10.Muthuservai
11.Muthukumar Servai
12.Ramu Servai 13.Kuppuservai
14.Maruthai Servai
15.Mani Servai
16.Ammaponnu Ammal
17.Gandhiammal
18.Meenammal 19.Raju Servai
20.Vellaiyammal 21.Kamalammal
22.Sarasammal 23.Veerakumar
24.Chellapanservai
25.Chellappan Servai
26.Rasu Servai
-27.Chinnathurai Servai
28.Kanjana
29.Dhalalakshmi 30.Ramakrishnan
31.Kamatchiammal
32.Kulanthairaj
33.Chandrasekaran
34.Anand
35.Amithammal
36.Rani Arokiyam ....Respondents CMSA(MD).No.11 of 2023 Karkandu .....Appellant Vs.
1.Periyammal 2.Valliammal 3.Ramasamy
4.Kamalammal
-5.R.Rasu Servai
6.Pandi Servai
7.Pappa
8. Manankathan 9.Muthu Servai
10.Muthukumar Servai
11.Ramu Servai 12.Kuppu Servai
13.Maruthai Servai
14.Mani Servai
15.Ammaponnu Ammal
16.Gandhiammal
17.Meenammal
18.Rajeswari
19.Vellaiyammal 20.Kamalammal
21.Sarasu Ammal
22.Veerakumar
23.Chellapan Servai
-24.Chellappan Servai
25.Rasu Servai 26.Chinnadurai
27.Kanchana
28.Dhalalakshmi 29.Ramakrishnan
30.Kamatchiammal
31.Kulanthai Raj
32.Raju Servai
33.Chandrasekaran
34.Anand
35.Amithammal
36.Rani Arokiyam ....Respondents (Since no relief is ought against the respondents 1, 2 and 4 to 36, notice to them may be dispense with)
PRAYER in CMSA(MD).No. 37 of 2015 : Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Sections 100 and 108 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2008 passed in EA.No.8 of 2007 in EP.No.562 of 1998 in O.S.No.861 of 1996 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Dindigul and confirmed by the judgment and decree dated 07.04.2015 passed in CMA.No.20 of 2009 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Dindigul.
-PRAYER in CMSA(MD).No.11 of 2023 : Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1 read with Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree dated 07.04.2015 passed in CMA.No.22 of 2009 by the Additional Subordinate Court, Dindigul confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2008 passed in EA.No.9 of 2007 in EP.No.562 of 1998 in O.S.No.861 of 1996 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Dindigul.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai in both the appeals For Respondents : Mr.G.Gomathi Sanker for R3 in CMSA.No.11 of 2023 and R1, R2, R4 to R36 are dispensed with. : Mr.R.R.Kannan for R1 to R4 in CMSA.No.37 of 2015 and R5 to R36 are dispensed with.
C O M M O N J U D G M E N T
CMSA(MD).No.37 of 2015 has been filed by the plaintiffs/ decree holders in a suit for partition challenging the allowing of an application under Order 21 Rule 90 C.P.C by the trial Court and confirmed by the First Appellate Court.
-2.CMSA(MD).No.11 of 2023 has been filed by the 35th defendant in CMA(MD).No.22 of 2009 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Dindigul challenging the allowing of an application under Order 21 Rule 90 C.P.C. The appellant in CMSA(MD).No.11 of 2023 is a purchaser from the decree holder by way of a sale deed dated 11.02.2005.
3. Factual Background:
(i).One Periyammal, Kamalammal and Valliammal as plaintiffs had filed O.S.No.861 of 1996 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Dindigul for the relief of partition and separate possession of their 2/15th share. The said suit was filed on 09.09.1986. A preliminary decree was passed on 14.11.1996. The plaintiffs had filed an application in I.A.No.60 of 1997 for passing a final decree and a final decree was passed on 14.07.1998. The decree holders had filed E.P.No.562 of 1998 to take delivery of the property as per final decree. According to the decree holders, they have taken delivery of the property.
(ii).The appellant in CMSA(MD).No.11 of 2023 had purchased an extent of 16