SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 76938

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice P. DHANABAL
Pathamuthu – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 17.07.2023 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Writ Petition (MD)No.289 of 2021 Periyakaruppan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Tahsildar, Srivilliputtur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

4.The President/ Executive Officer, Mamsapuram First Grade Panchayat, Mamsapuram, Melur, Srivilliputtur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

5.P.Sakthi Murugan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent herein to initiate Section 133 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 proceedings to control the nuisance in the property in Ayan Punja Survey No.704/1, Valaikulam Village, Srivilliputtur Taluk, Virudhunagar District in view of the petitioner's representation dated 25.11.2020.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jothibasu For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor For 5th Respondent : Mr.S.Ramesh

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this writ petition to direct the second respondent herein to initiate Section 133 of Cr.P.C., proceedings to control the nuisance in the property in Ayan Punja Survey No.704/1, Valaikulam Village, Srivilliputtur Taluk, Virudhunagar District, in view of the petitioner's representation dated 25.11.2020.

2.According to the petitioner, one Marimuthu Nadar is the owner of the property in Survey No.704/1, Patta No.1595, Valaikulam village, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar district and on 27.11.1982, he sold the property to South west Street Nadar Uravin Murai, Mamsapuram. The petitioner has purchased the property in his wife's name. The fifth respondent herein had purchased the property to an extent of 1.57 cents on 12.12.2013. The fifth respondent is running an organization in the name and style of 'Thiruchendur Murugan Thirukarthigai Theebam Pathayathirai Kulu'. After the purchase, the fifth respondent dumped the sand and fill up the well and he attempted to encroach the pathway in Survey No.704/1.

Further he created disturbance to the public by raising noise at the time of conducting pooja. He constructed a small temple pooja mandapam without obtaining plan approval from the concerned authorities. Due to the nuisance, the petitioner and the family and the public cannot lead a normal and peaceful live.

3.Further the petitioner's wife filed a suit in O.S.No.408 of 2017 before the Principal Sub Court, Srivilliputhur for declaration and injunction. The fifth respondent is the first defendant in the suit. The said suit is still pending. On 25.11.2000, the petitioner sent a representation to the respondents to take necessary steps to control the nuisance. But the fourth respondent have not responded to the representation given by the petitioner. Hence, he seeks a direction from this Court to invoke Section 133 of Cr.P.C., to take necessary steps to control the nuisance.

4.The fourth respondent has filed a counter stated that the petitioner has filed a petition before this Court to initiate proceedings under Section 133 of Cr.P.C., to control the nuisance in the property in Survey No.704/1, Valaikulam village, Srivilliputhur Taluk, VIrudhunagar District is not maintainable. The dispute between the petitioner and the fifth respondent pertains to the land in Survey No.704/1. In fact on getting the building plan approval, they constructed the building thereof. After getting representation dated 25.11.2020, the field staffs were deputed and they conducted investigation and then, a small temple has been raised. Since no construction was made, no building plan approval was sought for or granted. Since the civil suit is pending between the parties, they have to abide the decree passed by the civil suit. The respondents cannot venture into civil rights of the parties of the contesting parties. As per Section 133 of Cr.P.C., this respondents has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top