IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.Srimathy, J
S.S.Rahmathullah, R.Kandappan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
COMMON ORDER
The Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.6511 of 2023 is filed to quash the impugned revised Deputy Tahsildar Panel for the year 2004 to 2018 passed by the third respondent dated 14.07.2022 and consequential order dated 08.10.2022.
2. Pending writ petition, the writ petitioner had filed W.M.P.(MD)No. 13601 of 2023 to amend the prayer. In the amendment petition, the writ petitioner has sought to quash the impugned revised Deputy Tahsildar panel for the years from 2004 to 2018 dated 21.03.2023 of the 3rd respondent proceedings and the consequential impugned reversion order dated 23.03.2023 passed by the 3rd respondent and the same is allowed. Hence, the plea of the respondents that the challenge in the writ petition is the order dated 14.07.2022 and the same is already cancelled on 17.03.2023 cannot be entertained, since the petitioner had filed petition to amend the prayer and the said petition is allowed by this Court. Now the challenge in the Writ Petition is the impugned order dated 21.03.2023 of the 3rd respondent proceedings.
3. The petitioners were working as Tahsildar prior to the passing of the impugned orders and they are coming under the category of “Non-Graduate Promotee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.