A.No.5794 of 2023 in C.S.(Comm. Div.) No.115 of 2021 ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J., M/s.PVR INOX Limited ... Applicant Vs.

M/s.Sri Thenandal Films ... Respondent *****

This application has been filed to grant leave to mark the photocopy of the documents by way of secondary evidence.

2. A list has been annexed in Annexure - A to this application. The applicant is the plaintiff in the suit. Along with the plaint the applicant / plaintiff had filed documents which are xerox copies. The learned counsel for the applicant / plaintiff would now submit that the originals of the documents annexed along with the plaint are not traceable and under those circumstances, the applicant / plaintiff has filed this application, seeking leave of this Court to mark the photocopy of the documents which have been annexed in Annexure -A to this application.

3. According to the applicant / plaintiff, earlier M/s.Sathyam Cinemas had a contractual relationship with the respondent / defendant. Thereafter, M/s.Sathyam Cinemas got amalgamated with PVR Ltd., pursuant to amalgamation order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). Once again PVR Ltd. got amalgamated with the present applicant by virtue of another amal