SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 87557

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs.Justice S.SRIMATHY
CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
MINNALKODI – Respondent


THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.11.2023 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY S.A.(MD).Nos.367 and 368 of 2018 and C.M.P.(MD)No.10331 of 2018

1.Chandran

2.Banumathi ... Appellants in both S.As., /Vs./

1.Minnalkodi

2.Rajammal

3.Kodai

4.Geetha alias Thailammai

5.Saraswathy

6.Chelladurai ...Respondents in both S.As., COMMON P RAYER : Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree dated 27.04.2018 in A.S.Nos.41 and 25/2014 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Paramakudi, in reversing the judgment and decree dated 09.12.2013 in O.S.No.93/2010 on the file of District Munsif, Paramakudi.

For Appellants in both S.As., : Mr.S.Ramesh For R1 to R5 in both S.As., : Mr.S.Rajasekar For R6 : No appearance

COMMON JUDGMENT

The plaintiffs and the first defendant are the children of Govindhan Pillai. The plaintiffs are the daughters and the first defendant is the son. The third defendant is the subsequent purchaser from the first defendant. The second defendant is the husband of the third defendant. Hence, the defendants 2 and 3 are subsequent purchasers through the first defendant.

For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be ref

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top