SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 87562

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hon`ble The CHIEF JUSTICE
Geetha Raman – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.A.No.2450 of 2022

1.Geetha Raman

2.S.Ravi

3.Srimathi Kumar

4.Vasumathi Madhavan

5.Sumathi Srinivasan .. Appellants (Appellants 1, 3, 4 & 5 are represented by their power agent S.Ravi - 2nd appellant)

Vs.

1.The Tahsildhar, Mylapore Taluk, Greenways Road, Chennai-600 028.

2.The Executive Officer, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Department of Arulmigu Madhavaperumal Thirukoil, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. .. Respondents Prayer : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 3.8.2022 passed in W.P.No.19667 of 2022.

For the Appellants : Mr.V.Chandrakanthan For the Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Government Pleader for respondent No.1 : Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Spl. Govt. Pleader (HR&CE)

for respondent No.2 JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

We have heard Mr.V.Chandrakanthan, learned counsel for the appellants; Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader for the first respondent; and, Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, learned Special Government Pleader (H

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top