Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, J
L.Mathialagan – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police K-8 Police Station Arumbakkam, Chennai - 600 106 – Respondent
W.P.No.39913 of 2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for police action regarding a money dispute. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court acknowledges the arguments presented by both sides. (Para 3) |
| 3. court finds that the matter is a civil dispute, not criminal. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed; no costs awarded. (Para 6) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the 1st respondent to take appropriate legal action as against the 2nd respondent, based on the petitioner's representation dated 04.09.2023 made to the 1st respondent in person in accordance with law.
2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submitted that based on the complaint given by the petitioner against the 2nd respondent, enquiry was conducted in C.S.R. No.491 of 2024 and since it was found there was a money dispute between the parties, the same was closed.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the 1st respondent and perused the materials available on record.
4. Since no adverse order is being passed against the 2nd respondent, notice to the 2nd respondent is dispensed with.
5. It is seen that the petitioner is trying to give criminal colour to a money transaction. Therefore, this Writ Petition is not maintainable.
6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
