IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, N.SENTHILKUMAR, JJ
S.Seenivasan – Appellant
Versus
G.Kannan – Respondent
A.S.(MD) No.112 of 2024 | C.M.P.(MD) No.6038 of 2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties settled before the execution court. (Para 1) |
| 2. appeal dismissed as settled out of court. (Para 2) |
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR A.S.(MD) No.112 of 2024 and C.M.P.(MD) No.6038 of 2024 S.Seenivasan ... Appellant -vs-
G.Kannan ... Respondent Appeal suit filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, as against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.28 of 2019, on the file of Additional District Court, Virudhunagar, dated 10.11.2022.
For Appellant : Mr.K.Seenu Ramachandran For Respondent : Mr.S.Mahesh Babu
J U D G M E N T
[Judgment of the Court was made by RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.] Both the learned counsel represented that the matter has been settled before the Execution Court and a full satisfaction report has been filed and recorded.
2. Recording the above submission, this appeal is dismissed as settled out of Court. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Subject to the Rules, court fee shall be refunded.
[T.K.R., J.] [N.S., J.]
07.01.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk To:
1.The Additional District Judge, Virudhunagar.
2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
AND N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.
krk A.S.(MD) No.112 of 2024 and C.M.P.(MD) No.6038 of 2024
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.