Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Vadamalai, J
Murugan – Appellant
Versus
Muthaiah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments presented on default dismissal's implications. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's reiteration of ensuring merits examination. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 3. final conclusion to allow appeals with remand. (Para 10) |
COMMON ORDER
These Criminal Revision Cases are filed to set aside the judgment, dated 29.03.2022 in Crl.A.Nos.28 and 27 of 2020 on the file of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Court, Tirunelveli, confirming the judgment, dated 24.04.2019 passed in C.C.Nos.136 and 137 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor.
2. The brief facts of the case:
The respondent filed the cases in C.C.Nos.136 and 137 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor against the revision petitioners U/s.200 of Cr.P.C. r/w Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the allegation of dishonor of the cheques for Rs.14,00,000/- and Rs.4,00,000/- issued by the respective revision petitioners. The revision petitioners have contested the cases. Both sides adduced oral and documentary evidences. After hearing both sides and after considering the evidences, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor passed the judgment, dated 24.04.2019, convicting
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
