Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
Tractors and Farm Equipment Limited (TAFE) – Appellant
Versus
Massey Ferguson Corp (MFC) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court rehearing interlocutory applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. definitions of parties and agreements. (Para 3) |
| 3. tafe's applications for interim injunction. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. arguments presented by tafe. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 5. counterarguments by mfc. (Para 11) |
| 6. court's analysis on trademark usage and quality control. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. discussion on tafe's claims and mfc's defenses. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. mediation and procedural issues. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 9. court's final observations and decision. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 10. conclusion and order by the court. (Para 52 , 53) |
ORDER :
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
This Court is rehearing the interlocutory applications in these suits pursuant to the directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court through its common judgment dated 18.11.2024 passed in O.S.A.(CAD) Nos.138 and 139 of 2024. By the aforesaid judgment, the Division Bench, while remanding the matter to the learned Single Judge, set aside the order dated 17.10.2024 passed in O.A.No.745 of 2024 in C.O.S.(Comm.Div.)No.190 of 2024 and d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
