Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
,
Petitioner / Accused – Appellant
Versus
Respondent / Complainant – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case background and disputed loan transaction details. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner's defense on interpolation and lack of source of funds. (Para 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. respondent's evidence and reliance on statutory presumptions. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's analysis of evidence, forensic report, and rejection of petitioner's defense. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
ORDER
The Criminal Revision Case is filed against order dated
14.08.2023, passed by the learned I-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur in Criminal Appeal No.152 of 2022, confirming the Judgment and Conviction passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Tiruvallur in S.T.C.No.19 of 2021, dated 28.11.2022.
2.The gist of the case is that the Petitioner / Accused and the Respondent / Complainant are friendly neighbours. On 28.01.2018, the Petitioner borrowed a hand loan of Rs.11,00,000/- from the respondent by executing a promissory note to replay the amount with 12% interest per annum and a issued post dated cheque, dated 18.12.2020, bearing No.114593, for a sum of Rs.11,00,000/-, drawn on Canara Bank Kotturpuram Chennai. On 18.12.2020, when the respondent presented the che
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
