Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
Anton Victoriya – Appellant
Versus
Ganeswari @ Blessy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner was denied interim custody due to the mother's attachment with the children. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner's remarriage is not an impediment to custody rights. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. visitation rights established until pending case resolution. (Para 8) |
| 4. judgment concludes by favoring visitation rights. (Para 9) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.02.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR C.R.P.(MD).No.2217 of 2022 and CMP(MD).No.10198 of 2022 Anton Victoriya ... Petitioner -vs-
Ganeswari @ Blessy ...Respondent PRAYER: The Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 25.10.2019 passed in I.A.No.163 of 2019 in G.W.O.P.No.172 of 2019 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
The petitioner in GWOP.No.172 of 2019 on the file of the Principal District Court, Thoothukudi is the revision petitioner.
2.The petitioner herein got married to the respondent on
08.05.2008. Due to matrimonial dispute, the petitioner herein had filed S.M.O.P.No.199 of 2016 before the District C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
