Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
S.Anitha, Inspector of Police – Appellant
Versus
S.Vijayalakshmi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case involving illegal arrest and disputes. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. discussion on the maintainability of writ appeals. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's analysis of section 46(4) of cr.p.c and its implications. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. court's findings on the actions of police officers and the implications of their conduct. (Para 18 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. final decisions regarding the appeals of the police officers. (Para 23) |
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)
These Writ Appeals are directed against the order dated 18.10.2019 allowing W.P(MD)No.5508 of 2019 filed by the first respondent herein (S.Vijayalakshmi).
2.The averments set out in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition can be summarized as follows:
The writ petitioner's husband / Saravanan is engaged in the business of selling tyres. His premises are located in D.No.31/1, Workshop Road, Madurai–1. His brother Madhu Pandian is also running a similar business on the opposite side. The relationship between the brothers came under strain. Madhu Pandian wanted to grab the petitioner's husband premises. He had obtained Saravanan's signatures by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
