SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20041

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Appellant
Versus
K.Kamatchi – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

S.M.Subramaniam, J.

Under assail is the order dated 13.09.2022 passed in W.P.No.17186 of 2015.

2. The District Collector, Kancheepuram District has instituted the present Intra Court Appeal mainly on the ground that compensation as admissible under the Indian Telegraph Act , 1885, is to be paid whenever high-tension electric line is commissioned in private properties. In respect of the properties belongs to the 1st respondent, District Collector in proceedings dated 14.03.2014 recorded the findings which reads as under:

“He has further stated that as per safety norms, there should not be any structures under the EHT lines. When the above one feeder charges, due to the presence of the above building within the induction limit, the line will either trip or power will pass through the building endangering to the lives moving there. It is further stated that the building is an unauthorized structure without proper approval. For that notices have been served to the building owner to demolish the building and also to the local body concerned to arrange for demolition of the structure vide their letter dated 30.07.2013 and 01.10.2013. But, the building has not been demolished yet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top