SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20069

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
,
Insurance Company – Appellant
Versus
Petitioners – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents:

JUDGMENT

Challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.806 of 2022, dated 19.02.2024 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Special District Judge (MACT), Madurai, this civil miscellaneous appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as per the ranking before the learned Tribunal.

3. The appellant Insurance Company is the 2nd respondent before the Tribunal. The petitioners are the legal heirs of the deceased person. The 1st respondent is the owner cum driver of the four wheeler involved in the accident. On 18.02.2022, after purchasing groceries, the deceased riding his TVS XL bearing registration no.TN67F7130 intending to cross the Virudhunagar to Thirumangalam NH7. While crossing the road from west to east, Hundai i10 bearing registration no.TN09BP6518 which was driven in a fast and negligent manner by the 1st respondent from south to north, hit against the rider of the two wheeler causing an accident. As a result of which, the rider of the two wheeler, namely Muthuramalingam sustained serious injuries, who on admission at Thirumangalam Government Hospital was declared dead on the date. The 1st respondent h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top