SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20485

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T.ASHA, J
M.Anbu – Appellant
Versus
J.Indira – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.B.Venugopal
For the Respondents:

ORDER

Challenging the order directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.2,16,250/- towards the education expenses and van fees of minor Mithun Karthik, the son of the petitioner and respondent covering the academic years 2019-2020 till 2023-2024, the respondent/husband is before this Court.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner who is making his submission for admission.

3.The perusal of the impugned order would indicate that the petitioner had married the first respondent on 09.12.2012 and out of the wedlock they have been blessed with a male child, the second respondent herein. The petitioner was working as a Government teacher earning a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- per month. Though the first respondent is qualified she was not in a position to get employment as she is unable to go for work as she has to take care of her child. The first respondent would submit that the marriage expenses was taken care only by her parents and after the birth of the second respondent the petitioner had not come to see the child. However, the petitioner and his family members were demanding a huge sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as dowry. The first respondent would submit that the petitioner has never taken ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top