Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
, J
Sangam Sahasrabudhe – Appellant
Versus
P.Ravindran – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of suit for recovery of salary. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendants' applications to reject plaint based on limitation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments regarding limitation and jurisdiction. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's observations on plaint rejection. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. final ruling on the revision petitions. (Para 21) |
COMMON ORDER
These two reviion petitions have been filed by the 1st and 4th defendants in C.O.S.No.3 of 2023 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Court, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil challenging the dismissal of I.A.Nos.1 and 3 of 2023 by the trial Court.
(A)Facts leading to the filing of these revision petitions are as follows:
2.The first respondent herein as plaintiff had filed the above said suit for the relief of recovery of a sum of Rs.39,22,000/-. It is the case of the plaintiff that the fourth defendant company is a sister concern of the first defendant company. The first defendant company had directed the fourth defendant to issue a letter of intent to the second defendant company for the purposes of installation of mechanical and piping works for six spinning lines at Malaysia. The second defendant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
