SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20490

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
, J
Sangam Sahasrabudhe – Appellant
Versus
P.Ravindran – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents:

COMMON ORDER

These two reviion petitions have been filed by the 1st and 4th defendants in C.O.S.No.3 of 2023 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Court, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil challenging the dismissal of I.A.Nos.1 and 3 of 2023 by the trial Court.

(A)Facts leading to the filing of these revision petitions are as follows:

2.The first respondent herein as plaintiff had filed the above said suit for the relief of recovery of a sum of Rs.39,22,000/-. It is the case of the plaintiff that the fourth defendant company is a sister concern of the first defendant company. The first defendant company had directed the fourth defendant to issue a letter of intent to the second defendant company for the purposes of installation of mechanical and piping works for six spinning lines at Malaysia. The second defendant which is the sister concern of the third defendant and the first defendant have jointly formed the fourth defendant company for mobilisation of man power and technical staff from India to Malaysia for erection and commissioning of six spinning lines at a lesser cost.

3.It is the further contention of the plaintiff that he received an offer letter from the third defend

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top