Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
Vellaichamy – Appellant
Versus
The Sub-Registrar, Office of Sub Registrar, Kulithalai, Karur District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claimants' rights regarding property attachments (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. appropriate legal avenues to challenge attachment orders (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. final determination of the court regarding the petition (Para 8) |
ORDER
The petitioner seeks for the following relief :
''Writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Refusal Slip in Refusal Number.RFL/Kulithalai/1/2025, dated 02.01.2025, issued by the respondent, and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to register the sale deed, dated 02.01.2025, presented by the petitioner for registration.''
2. There exists an order of attachment, passed by the learned District Munsif at Kulithalai. Referring to the said attachment, the respondent issued Refusal Check Slip.
3. In terms of Section 22-B (3) of the Registration Act , the Sub-
Registrar is duty bound to take note of attachment orders passed by a competent authority under the State or the Central law, or by a Court or Tribunal. The section brooks no exception.
4. The case of the petitioner is that he purchased the property in the year 1991 and alienated the same in the year 2025. At the time of alienation, th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
