IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
B.Sarumathy – Appellant
Versus
State Rep.By, The Inspector of Police, T17, Perumbakkam Police Station, Tambaram District. – Respondent
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.41 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.
2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the second respondent let out his premises for rent to run a old age home, in which the petitioner was working as a Staff Nurse. While being so, the second respondent fell in love with her and also paid some amount. After receipt of money, the petitioner switched off her phone and cheated the second respondent. Hence, the complaint.
4. On receipt of the complaint, the respondent registered FIR in Crime No.41 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC .
5. A perusal of records revealed that the petitioner had worked in the old age home for a period of one month and she had also produced statement of accounts before this Court. There is absolutely no evidence to show that the second respondent had transferred the amount through RTGS to the petitioner. Even assuming that there was some money transaction, it is only loan transaction and as such, no offence is made out as against the petitioner.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.