Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
The Management of Essem Engineering – Appellant
Versus
A.Loganathan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. resignation's validity questioned based on coercion. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding duress and evidence presented. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court concluded on compensation instead of reinstatement. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. final order on compensation payment confirmed. (Para 8 , 9) |
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in I.D.No.63 of 2015 dated
30.11.2018 on the file of the learned Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore and quash the same.
2.The case of the petitioner is that the respondent was appointed as welder under the petitioner concern during the year 1992 and due to ill health, he voluntarily resigned the job on 25.09.2014 and vacated the quarters allotted to him and raised industrial dispute under Section 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act in I.D.No.63 of 2015 as if the petitioner forced him to resign the job and the Labour Court passed the impugned order directing the petitioner to reinstate the respondent into service with continuity of service, 50% backwages and other attendant benefits. Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the pe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
