IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
M/s.Nandhi Irrigatino System Limited – Appellant
Versus
State rep by The Inspector of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over unpaid commercial transactions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. proceedings quashed based on legal findings. (Para 5 , 9) |
| 3. criminal charges not substantiated; civil remedy is appropriate. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
O R D E R
This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.2915 of 2024 on the file of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant, a power agent for M/s. Rishab Triexin LLP, lodged a complaint stating that in January 2019, Mrs.Sujala and other directors introduced themselves as directors of M/s.Nandhi Irrigation Ltd. and M/s. SPY Agro Ltd., and stated that Mrs.Sujala was responsible for managing the day-to-day affairs of both companies, including financial matters. Based on this introduction, the defacto complainant agreed to supply PVC raw materials to M/s. Nandhi Irrigation Pvt Ltd. Business transactions began in February 2019, but from the start, the accused company frequently defaulted on payments and failed to maintain proper accounting, leading to discrepancies. Despite this, the defacto complainant continued supplying materials. While being so, on 13.10.2022, a me
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.