O R D E R

The main contention put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that to the facts of this case, the application of Section 8 of The Hindu Succession Act is erroneous and the proper Section would be Section 6 of the . The learned counsel would also invite the attention of this Court about the factual position in this regard.

2. It is well settled principle of law that the power of review can be exercised only for correction of inadvertent apparent error, but not to substitute a different view. In this regard, it is relevant to refer the following judgments:-

1. Kamlesh Verma Vs. Mayawati and others reported in (2013) 8 SCC 320 ;

2. S.Murali Sundaram Vs. Jothibai Kannan and Others reported in (2023) 13 SCC 515 .

3. Therefore, this Court could not find any apparent error on the face of it, so as to interfere with the order of this Court dated 12.12.2023. Hence, this Review Application is devoid of merits.

4. Accordingly, the Review Application stands dismissed. No costs.