SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23266

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J
M/s.L and T Geostructure LLP – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
Writ Petitions



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents: Senior Standing Counsel

The court upheld the validity of Rule 36(4) of the GST Rules, stating the restrictions on Input Tax Credit were reasonable and aimed at preventing fraudulent claims, with the issue becoming academic post-implementation of Form GSTR 2A.

Headnote:(A) Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017 - Rule 36(4) - Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax (TNGST) Act, 2017 - Rule 36(4) - Challenge to the constitutional validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST and TNGST Rules regarding restrictions on Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Court held that the restrictions imposed were not arbitrary and were within the powers conferred by the respective GST Acts - The amendments to Rule 36(4) over time were aimed at regulating the availing of ITC and preventing revenue leakages - The temporary restrictions have now become academic with the implementation of Form GSTR 2A which facilitates full ITC availment upon compliance. (Paras 1, 12, 100, 103, 109)

(B) Constitutional Law - Article 14 - The court found no violation of the right to equality as the restrictions under Rule 36(4) were reasonable and aimed at ensuring legitimate ITC claims while preventing fraudulent activities. (Paras 103, 109)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner challenged the vires of Rule 36(4) of CGST and TNGST Rules, arguing that the restrictions imposed on availing ITC were arbitrary and ultra vires the respective GST Acts. The court examined the evolution of Rule 36(4) and its amendments over time.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the validity of Rule 36(4), stating that the restrictions were necessary to prevent misuse and ensure compliance, and noted that the issue had become academic due to the implementation of Form GSTR 2A.

Issues: The main issues were whether the restrictions imposed by Rule 36(4) were arbitrary and whether they violated Article 14 of the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the restrictions were a temporary measure aimed at regulating ITC claims and were within the legislative framework. The implementation of Form GSTR 2A has since resolved the issue of restricted ITC availment.

Result: Writ Petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to the gst rules. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. petitioner's arguments against rule 36(4). (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30)
3. court's analysis of the gst enactments. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102)
4. court's decision on the validity of rule 36(4). (Para 106 , 107 , 108)

(Order of the Court was made by C. SARAVANAN, J.

In these Writ Petitions, the Petitioner has challenged the vires of Rule36(4) of both Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'CGST Rules') and Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax (TNGST) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'TNGST Rules'). Rule 36(4) of the respective GST Rules read identically.

2. These Writ Petitions are of the year 2020. When these Writ Petitions were filed, Rule 36(4) of the respective GST Rules read differently from how it read after its amendment with effect from 01.01.2022

3. Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules as it stood at the time when these Writ Petitions were filed and at the time of passing of this Order are reproduced below for the sake of clarity:-

Table-I

(1) .....

(2) .....

(3) .....

(4) Input tax credit to be availed by a registered person in respect of invoices or debit notes, the details of which have not been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37, shall not exceed 20 per cent of the eligible credit available in respect of invoices or debit notes the details of which have been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37.

(1) .....

(2) .....

(3) .....

(4) No Input Tax Credit shall be availed by a registered person in respect of invoices or debit notes the details of which are required to be furnished under sub-section (1) of section 37 unless,-

(a) the details of such invoices or debit notes have been furnished by the supplier in the statement of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1 or using the invoice furnishing facility; and

(b) the details of input tax credit in respect of such invoices or debit notes have been communicated to the registered person in FORM GSTR-2B under sub-rule (7) of rule 60.

4. During the period between 01.01.2017 and 08.10.2019, the impugned Rule in these Writ Petitions, i.e., Rule 36(4) were not there in the respective GST Rules. The above provision was inserted by CGST (6th Amendment) Rules 2019 with effect from 09.10.2019. Later, the aforesaid Rule was further amended on various occasions. Finally, vide CGST (10th Amendment) Rules, 2021 with effect from 01.01.2022, Rule 36(4) of the respective GST Rules stands as extracted above in Column 2 in Table I of this Order.

5. As far as TNGST Rules are concerned, Rule 36(4) of the Rules was first inserted by Notification No. SRO A-39(a)/2019 dated 11.10.2019 with effect from 09.10.2019 vide TNGST (6th Amendment) Rules, 2019. The impugned amendment to Rule 36(4) of the TNGST Rules was later substituted by Notification No. SRO A-48(a)/2020 dated 23.12.2020 with effect from 01.01.2021 vide TNGST (14th Amendment) Rules, 2020.

6. At the time of inception of Rule 36(4) of the respective GST Rules, with effect from 09.10.2019, a registered person was entitled to avail restricted Input Tax Credit (ITC) equivalent to the 20% of the eligible credit if the details of invoices or debit notes had not been uploaded by the supplier under Section37(1) of the respective GST Acts.

7. The restrictions in the sub-clause (4) to Rule 36 of the respective GST Rules that was initially fixed at 20% with effect from 09.10.2019 was reduced over a period to 10% and thereafter to 5% and eventually to 'Nil' Input Tax Credit (ITC), if the details, required un

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top