Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. Lakshminarayanan, J
SARAYU RAMESH PATTABHIRAMAN – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector General of Registration – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks relief due to refusal of settlement deed registration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. advocates presented their arguments on behalf of the parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's reasoning on procedural compliance and registration duty. (Para 4) |
| 4. court discusses authority of registering officer regarding title. (Para 5) |
| 5. final order for registration of deed within specified time. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
The petitioner seeks for the following relief:-
To issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 3rd respondent culminating in its refusal order No.RFL/Neelankarai/13/2025 dated 02.05.2025 and quash the same and consequentially direct the 3rd respondent to register the Settlement Deed dated 02.05.2025 executed and presented by the petitioner in favour of her younger sister Gayathri Ramesh Pattabhiraman transferring my 50% remainder interest in the residential house measuring about 4,500 sq.ft. together with land measuring about 30.67 cents, bearing Door No.2/176, Old No.2/134, Coral March Avenue, East Coast Road, Uthandi, Chennai - 600 119.
2. The case of the petitioner is that her father one Ramesh Pattabhiraman had executed a settlement deed in her favour on 11.11.20
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
