SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23863

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. Justice, J
K. Sastha Deavi – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Secretary to the – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Ravi Shankar
For the Respondents: Mr.K.Govindarajan, Mr.Gnanasekaran

The court reinforced that citizenship verification must be conducted by a competent authority as per the Citizenship Act, 1955, ensuring due process in nationality confirmation.

Headnote:(A) Citizenship Act, 1955 - Section 13 - Citizenship Rules, 2009 - Writ petition seeking return of impounded passport - Petitioner, an Indian citizen, claimed wrongful impounding of passport due to nationality suspicion - Authorities failed to verify nationality - Court directed competent authority to process citizenship verification. (Paras 27, 33)

(B) Competent Authority - The court clarified that only an officer not below the rank of Under Secretary to the Government of India can certify citizenship in case of doubt, as per the Citizenship Act and Rules. (Paras 31, 32)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, born in India, had her passport impounded on suspicion of her parents' nationality. Despite providing documents, the authorities delayed verification of her citizenship.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the impounding of the passport was unwarranted and directed the competent authority to take necessary action within 12 weeks.

Issues: The main issue was the authority responsible for confirming nationality in case of doubt.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the verification of nationality must be conducted by the appropriate authority as defined in the Citizenship Act, emphasizing the need for proper documentation.

Result: The writ petition is allowed, directing the return of the passport.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's background and circumstances surrounding passport impoundment. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8)
2. arguments presented by the petitioner and respondents regarding nationality verification. (Para 9 , 10)
3. court's observations on the responsibilities of authorities regarding nationality verification. (Para 11 , 12 , 18 , 19 , 21)
4. clarification on the competent authority for nationality certification. (Para 31 , 32)
5. final directive for the return of the passport and processing of citizenship verification. (Para 33)

ORDER

This writ petition is filed seeking to direct the 2nd respondent to forthwith return the petitioner's passport bearing No.M9172689 which has been wrongfully impounded on the ground of suspicion of nationality.

2.The petitioner is a citizen of India born on 18th November 1991 in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. Her Indian citizenship is rooted in her Indian heritage as she is the daughter of Indian parents, namely, Karunanandan and Rajeshwary. Her father Late.Thiru.Karunanandan who was born on 23rd March 1953 was an Indian citizen as evidenced by his Indian passport bearing No. T464115. However, the said Thiru.Karunanandan passed away on 7th February 2012.

3.While being so, the petitioner's mother Tmt.Rajeshwary was diagnosed with a severe mental disorder and was undergoing treatment at Aram Care Foundation in Chennai and she also passed away on 30.05.2024 at Chennai. On the night of 20th / 21st December 2018, the petitioner's passport bearing No.M9172689 was seized by the Bureau of Immigration during her departure clearance for a flight to Doha at the Chennai Airport. At the time of seizure, no specific reason was provided and she was instructed to report to the 4th respondent office within two working days as her passport had been forwarded for further investigation.

4.On 22nd December 2018, she visited the 4th respondent, that is, the Foreigners Regional Registration Office at Shastri Bhavan, Nungambakkam, Chennai, to enquire about the status of the petitioner's impounded passport. The officials advised her to contact the Tiruchirappalli Regional Passport Office where her passport was issued. Accordingly, she visited the Tiruchirappalli Regional Passport Office, that is, the 2nd respondent and submitted all necessary documents as required by them. However, she received a show-cause notice dated 04.01.2019 from the 2nd respondent, informing her that her passport has been impounded due to suspicion regarding her nationality.

5.The show-cause notice required her to appear before them and provide clarification along with all necessary documents for the investigation within 15 days. In response to the same, the petitioner made a formal visit to the 2nd respondent's office and submitted all relevant documents, including her birth certificate, educational certificates, PAN card and proof of residence to establish her Indian nationality along with a representation requesting to release her passport which was impounded. Though in terms of their direction, the petitioner submitted all the documents of her father including his passport, PAN card, voter's card, ration card, legal heir certificate and death certificate, due to her mother's serious health condition, she was unable to provide any of her documents related to her nationality.

6.Despite explaining her mother's health condition and her own circumstances, the officials at the 2nd respondent Office insisted that her case could not proceed without verifying her mother's nationality. She was later informed by the 2nd respondent that they have sent a letter to the Q Branch Office in Chennai, that is, the 3rd respondent, requesting verification of her parents nationality. However, due to no response from the 3rd respondent until the end of 2019, the 2nd respondent could not take any further action. Due to the pandemic situation in 2020, she had sent an E-mail to the 2nd respondent's help desk team in March 2020 requesting an update on the status of her fil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top