Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M. NIRMAL KUMAR
P.S. APPARELS (INDIA) – Appellant
Versus
ANNAPURNI HARIHARAN @ SUMATHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and factual background. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the cheque's issuance and liability. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. counterarguments related to authorization and evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's analysis of evidence and legal principles. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. discussion on the enforceability of the cheque and liability. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. final judgment and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT
The appellant as complainant filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the respondent in C.C.No.1180 of 2015. The trial Court, by the judgment dated 12.09.2019, found the respondent guilty, convicted the respondent and sentenced him to undergo one year simple imprisonment and to pay a fine amount of 11,60,000/- as compensation. Aggrieved against the same, the respondent preferred an appeal before the XVIII Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in Crl.A.No.334 of 2019. The learned Sessions Judge, by the judgment dated 13.08.2021 allowed the appeal setting aside the conviction and sentence of the trial Court, against which, the appellant/complainant had filed this present appe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
