Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J
D.Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
V.Muthukumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent's justification for the petition. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner's lack of defense. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. judicial conclusion and order. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER
The Criminal Revision is directed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.10 of 2024 in S.T.C.No.59 of 2023 dated 07.01.2025 on the file of the Fast Track Court, Srivilliputtur, directing the petitioner/accused to deposit 20% of the cheque amount to the respondent/complainant. 2. The petitioner is the accused and the respondent as complainant has filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. for the alleged offence under Section 138 r/w 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act . When the trial of the case was pending in part-heard stage, the respondent invoking Section 143(A)(1) of has filed the above petition seeking orders directing the petitioner to deposit 20% of the cheque amount into the Court.
3. The case of the respondent, in the petition filed under Section
143(A)(1) of Negotiable Instruments Act , is that during the pendency of the complaint, bailable warrant came to be issued against the petitioner and since the same was not complied, Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) came to be issued, that sinc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
