SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24832

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
BATTU DEVANAND, J
A. Maheswari – Appellant
Versus
S. Kannappan, A. Karuppasamy, V.C. Rameswara Murugan – Respondent
Contempt Petition No. 3137 of 2024



Advocates:
Mr. R. Saseetharan
Mrs. S. Mythreye Chandru
Mr. R. Neelakandan
Mr. R. Siddharth

Court's findings highlight compliance with a prior order and cessation of contempt proceedings.

Headnote:This Contempt Petition was filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act for the willful disobedience of a court order. The respondents asserted compliance by issuing an appointment order to the petitioner. The court, given the fulfillment of the order, found no further adjudication necessary and concluded the matter.

Table of Content
1. contempt petition concluded without further action. - What was the court's ruling on further proceedings? (Para 4)

O R D E R

This Contempt Petition has been filed complaining wilful disobedience of the order dated 20.11.2023 in W.P. No. 25271 of 2017.

2. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the order of the Court is complied with by issuing appointment order to the petitioner vide order dated 17.05.2025 and the petitioner joined in service also.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also endorsed the same.

4. In view of the above factual position, in our considered view, further adjudication is not required in the present contempt case.

5. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top