IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:06.09.2022 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR C.R.P.No.959 of 2022 R.K.Madhavan ...Petitioner Versus

1.Thulukan Chatram Charities Trust, Rep by its Muthavalli, Ameenuddin Abdul Hasan, S/o.Muthursa Hasan, Naravarikuppam, Red Hills, Tiruvallur District.

2. District Collector of Thiruvallur District, Thiruttani – Thiruvallur Road, Thiruvallur Town.

3.District Revenue Officer, Collector Office, Thiruttani – Thiruvalluvar Road, Thiruvallur Town and District.

4.Thahsildar, Madhavaram Taluk Office, Thiruvallur Town and District.

...Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, r/w Section 83(a) or Waqf Act, against the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2021 in O.S.No.53 of 2019 on the file of Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal, Chennai.

For Petitioner :M/s.Uma Shankar For R1 : Mr.N.A.Nissar Ahmed For R2 to R4 :Ms.Dr.S.Suriya Additional Government Pleader O R D E R This Revision is filed challenging the judgment and decree passed by Wakf Tribunal granting declaration that order passed by the 3^rd respondent dated 04.07.2016, ordering registration of the land measuring 0.00.5 hectares (60ftx56ft) in S.No.97B/3F of Naravarikuppam Village, Madavaram Taluk in the name of revision petitioner is null and void and not binding upon 1^st respondent.

2. The first respondent is a Trust called Thulukkan Chatram Charities Trust administered by Mutawalli. It filed a suit for declaration that the order dated 04.07.2016 passed by the 3^rd respondent is null and void and not binding upon it. According to the first respondent, originally it was the owner of property described in the plaint in S.No.97B/3F under Inam title deed T.D.1709. After coming into force of Minor Inam Abolition Act 30/63, Inam patta was granted in patta No.197 in favour of first respondent by Settlement Tahsildar, Chengalpet, by his order dated 22.04.1970. The petitioner herein, challenged the same before the Assistant Settlement Officer and the same was dismissed on 29.02.1972 as evidenced by Ex.A9. The revision petitioner again challenged the said order before the Settlement Officer and his appeal was dismissed by order dated 17.12.1974 as evidenced by Ex.A10. The revision petitioner had taken the matter to the Board of Revenue by revision and the same was also dismissed by order of Board of Revenue dated 28.10.1975 marked as Ex.A11. Therefore, the patta granted in favour of first respondent by Settlement Tahsildar under Minor Inam Abolition Act proceedings became final. After long time, the revision petitioner filed a petition dated 21.01.2013 before Revenue Divisional Officer, Ambattur, seeking issuance of patta in respect of very same property and the same was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the revision petitioner filed a revision before 3^rd respondent and the said revision was allowed by order dated 04.07.2016, directing grant of patta in the name of revision petitioner. The first respondent Trust filed the above suit for declaration that order passed by the 3^rd respondent is null and void mainly on the ground that the 3^rd respondent has no right or jurisdiction to order patta in the name of revision petitioner after Inam patta granted in the name of first respondent/Trust attained finality by order passed by Board of Revenue.

3. The revision petitioner filed a written statement stating that the suit property was purchased by his grandmother Ammani Ammal under sale deed dated 02.01.1907 marked as Ex.A2. The revision petitioner further submitted that said Ammani Ammal filed O.S.No.71 of 1931 on the file of District Munsif Court, Poonamallee, against the 3^rd parties and the first respondent Trust, which was arrayed as 5^th defendant therein. In the said suit it was claimed by Ammani Ammal that said suit property belonged to first respondent Trust and said Ammani Ammal put up building thereon and let out the same to tenants and collecting the rent. It was also submitted that Ammani Ammal was pa