SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 56206

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice V. SIVAGNANAM
R.Guruvayurappan – Appellant
Versus
The Director General of Poli – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.26160 of 2022 and WMP.No.25251 of 2022 R. Guruvayurappan ...Petitioner Vs

1. The Director General of Police Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.

2. The Commissioner of Police Tiruppur, Tiruppur District 641 687.

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District 641 687.

4. The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Kundadam Police Station, Tiruppur District 638 702. ...

Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus for bearing the respondents from in any way interfering with the petitioner's right to practice and prescribe alternative medicines strictly inconformity with the Certificate of Community Medical Services and alternative medicines to carry on lawful occupation under Article 19 (l)(g) of the Constitution of India by considering our representation dated 22.07.2021 in view of the law declared in Dr.Mukhtiar Chand case [1998 (7) SCC 579].

For Petitioner ... Mr.K.Rajendra Prasad For Respondents ... Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

The Writ Petition has been filed for bearing the respondents from in any way interfering with the petitioner's right to practice and prescribe alternative medicines strictly inconformity with the Certificate of Community Medical Services and alternative medicines to carry on lawful occupation under Article 19 (l)(g) of the Constitution of India by considering our representation dated 22.07.2021 in view of the law declared in Dr.Mukhtiar Chand case [1998 (7) SCC 579].

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a practitioner of alternative medicine Ayurveda and he got Community Medical Service Certificate Course (CMS). The respondent police without any reason interfered with the practice of the petitioner as though he is practicing allopathic and other medicines. Hence he filed this writ petition. He further contended that previously the petitioner and others have filed W.P. Nos.10920 & 10921 of 2017 and this Court on 15.03.2019 had passed the following order.

" In the light of the said assurance given in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petitions, both the writ petitions are disposed of, directing the respondents to permit the petitioners to practice in their respective field alone. So long as the petitioners are practicing in their respective mode of medicine, the respondents and their police officials are restrained from initiating any action against them. However, it is open to the respondents or their officials to verify and find out whether the petitioners are practicing in other fields, viz., Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani, Allopathy etc., and if the petitioners are practicing in such fields, it is open to the police officials to initiate action against such of the petitioners in accordance with law".

3. The petitioner is not practicing allopathic and other medicines. He is practicing only Ayurveda. Therefore interference of the police has to be prohibited.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioner has given a representation dated 22.07.2021 which was considered by the respondent police and the petitioner also appeared and gave an undertaking that he will not practice any medicine other than Ayurveda basis and that enquiry was closed on 12.09.2021 as no paper is pending.

5. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even recently the police asked the petitioner to come for enquiry. 6. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

7. On a perusal of the records, it is seen that the petitioner is a practitioner of alternative medicines like Ayurveda, Unani and Yoga etc. and obtained Community Medical Service Certificate Course (CMS) and he had already given an assurance by way of an undertaking that he would not practice any other field other than

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top