SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 58222

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs Justice TV. THAMILSELVI
SMT. POOVATHAL (DIED) – Appellant
Versus
RUKUMANI – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI C.R.P.No. 622 of 2017 and C.M.P. No. 3182 of 2017 Smt. Poovathal (died)

1. Kannammal, W/o. Late Ramasamy

2. Arukkathal, W/o. Late Palanisamy ... Petitioners Versus

1. Rukmani, W/o. Karuppasamy Ammaiammal (died)

2. Rasappa Gounder @ Kumarasamy, S/o. Avinashi Gounder

3. K.Palanisamy, S/o. Kumarasamy

4. Mallika, W/o. Deivasigamani

5. Shanthi, W/o. Kumar

6. Balasubramaniam, S/o. Ramasamy 7. Kumarasamy, S/o. Ramasamy

8. Meganathan @ Nathan, S/o. Ramasamy

9. Dhanalakshmi, W/o. Velusamy 10. Jaganathan, S/o. Palanisamy 11. Ravikumar, S/o. Palanisamy

12. Rajeswari, W/o. Balasubramaniam

13. Velusamy, S/o. Ramasamy

14. Shanthi, W/o. Balasubramaniam

15. Kumar, W/o. Velusamy ... Respondents PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Art. 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and final order dated 21.12.2016 made in I.A.No. 1142 of 2016 in O.S.No. 218 of 2013 on the file of II Addl.

District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur.

For Petitioners : Mr.N.S.Sivakumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Prakasam for R1 R2, R4, R10 to R15 – No appearance R6 to R8 – Door locked R3 & R9 – Person not found

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the fair and final order dated 21.12.2016 made in I.A.No. 1142 of 2016 in O.S.No. 218 of 2013 on the file of II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur.

2. Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for petitioners herein submitted that as per e-court status, suit itself got disposed of on 01.09.2017 and he has also made endorsement to that effect. So, the relief claimed in this Civil Revision Petition became infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.

3. In view of the submission made by the learned Counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

08.11.2022 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order rpp To II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur.

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

rpp

08.11.2022

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top