Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Judge, J
Kochappan Thomas – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basic facts of the loan and cheque issuance. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. procedural history of the complaint and trial. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. appeal against acquittal and its implications. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. arguments of the revision petitioner regarding liability. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's consideration of procedural correctness. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. analysis of liability under the memorandum of understanding. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. court's reasoning on the burden of proof. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. judicial observations on the trial court's decision. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. reassessment of evidence and legal standards. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 10. final considerations on the appeal's legitimacy. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
ORDER
The Criminal Revision Case is filed to set aside the judgment passed in Crl. A. No.507 of 2018 dated 27.04.2019 on the file of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore in reversing the order of acquittal dated 24.09.2018 passed in C.C. No. 14 of 2014 on the file of the Fast Track Magistrate-I, Coimbatore.
2. For adjudication of this Criminal Revision, certain basic facts which are essential, are delineated hereunder.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
