Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
Mythili – Appellant
Versus
Manimegalai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the judgment and complaint leading to the revision.' (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding misuse of the cheque. (Para 4) |
| 3. the court's findings on the evidence and relevance under section 138. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. observations on account blocking and dishonour's implications. (Para 9) |
| 5. conclusion and outcome of the revision. (Para 12) |
ORDER
This criminal revision has been preferred against the judgment dated 08.07.2022 passed in Crl.A.No.7 of 2021 on the file of the III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Erode at Gopichettipalayam, thereby confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court in STC.No.951 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Gopichettipalayam, dated 27.11.2020, for the offence punishable under Section 138 of NI Act.
2. The petitioner is the accused in the complaint lodged by the respondent herein. The respondent lodged complaint for the offence punishable under Section 138 of NI Act and alleged that on 29.07.2018, the petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as hand loan for urgent need. On the said day, the petitioner had issued post-dated cheque for the said sum dated 07.08.2018. On 07.08
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
