SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 75365

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN
R.VENKATASUBHU MARIMUTHU – Appellant
Versus
L.RAJA – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.09.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.S.(MD)Nos.39 and 40 of 2017 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2458 of 2017 in A.S.(MD)No.39 of 2017 A.S.(MD)No.39 of 2017:-

R.Venkatasubbu Marimuthu @ R.V.S.Marimuthu ... Appellant Vs.

1.L.Raja

2.P.R.Sakthivel

3.A.Raju

4.M.Antony

5.T.Rayappan

6.S.Chinnamani

7.S.Sankaranarayanan

8.K.R.Ponnuswamy Pandiyan

9.SMS Infrastructure Ltd., Managing Director, Subash Manapur.

10.S.Ayyappan

11.The Branch Manager, Dharani Cements Office, At Ariyalur, Trichy District.

12.Kasim Pakkir

13.Sulaikka Banu 14.M.Manokaran 15.Sethulakshmi

16.P.M.V.Nagajothi

17.C.Tamilmanni

18.K.Ramachandran

19.S.Mariyappan

20.K.Kothandaramar 21.M.Archana Devar 22.M.Ramakrishnan

23.Sudalaimani

24.N.Muthuramalingam

25.M.Radhakrishnan

26.Sakthikumar M.Sanjchetty Ltd., Engineers & Constractors, General Manager, Sri Milint Thikrajkar

27.Raja Rajeshwari

28.M.Shanthi

29.M/s.Subbu Reality (South) Private Limited, Power of Attorney, Ayyakutti.

30.Maegavel @ Migavel

31.A.Subramanian

32.Annamari 33.S.Sellaiah

34.Easakki Raja ... Respondents Prayer : Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code r/w. Order 41 Rules 1 and 2 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 19.11.2016 made in O.S.No.73 of 2010 on the file of the learned I Additional District Court, Thoothukudi (Full Additional In-charge).

For Appellant : Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj For Respondents : Mr.N.GA.Nataraj for R12 & R13 Mr.S.Krishnamoorthy for R14, R17 & R18 M/s.Mathuvanthy Mathavan for R11 Mr.N.Subramani For R16, R19, R22, R27, R30, R32 & R33 No appearance for R3, R5, R8, R20, R24, & R26 A.S.(MD)No.40 of 2017:-

R.Venkatasubbu Marimuthu @ R.V.S.Marimuthu

2.V.Alamelu

3.Rathina Selvei ... Appellants Vs.

1.C.Tamilmani

2.M.Manoharan

3.K.Ramachandiran ... Respondents Prayer : Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 19.11.2016 made in O.S.No.23 of 2012 on the file of the learned I Additional District Court, Thoothukudi.

For Appellant : Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj For Respondents : Mr.S.Krishnamoorthy COMMON JUDGEMENT The learned counsel for the appellants has circulated a letter seeking leave to withdraw these appeal suits.

2.Leave granted. These appeal suits are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

23.09.2021 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To:

The I Additional District Court, Thoothukudi.

Copy to:

The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

ias

23.09.2021

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top