Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SANJIB BANERJEE, CJ, P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J
Hindustan Unilever Limited – Appellant
Versus
S.Shanthi Proprietrix: Lakshmi Soaps through her power holder D.Suyaraj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the appeals and their context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15) |
| 2. provisions of the commercial courts act under scrutiny. (Para 7 , 19 , 25 , 39 , 40 , 102) |
| 3. judicial interpretation of statutory wording. (Para 14 , 51 , 52 , 65 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90) |
| 4. discussion on definitions and implications. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. determination of maintainability of appeals. (Para 57 , 61) |
| 6. final observations on the court's authority and decisions. (Para 59 , 97) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
The extent to which appeals are permitted in respect of matters covered by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”) falls for a comprehensive consideration.
2. There are, in all, 13 appeals which are taken up together since the issue of appellability is involved in all or most of them. At the outset, it is necessary that the nature of the orders be seen so that it may be assessed whether an intra-court appeal lies therefrom under Section 13 (1A) of the said Act.
3. OSA No.230 of 2019 is a proposed appeal against the dismissal of an application seeking rejectio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
