Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
JUSTICE, J
Sivaraman – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks single charge framing. (Para 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. the allegations detail multiple misappropriations. (Para 4 , 10) |
| 3. arguments regarding trial consolidation presented. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 13) |
| 4. arguments for and against single trial processing. (Para 12) |
| 5. framework surrounding charges and procedures. (Para 15) |
| 6. applicable law for grouping of misappropriation charges. (Para 16 , 18) |
ORDER
This case was taken up through video conferencing.
2. This criminal original petition has been preferred seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate Court No.IV, Salem, to frame a single charge for the commission of offences under Sections 409 , 468 and 471 IPC in C.C.No.34 of 2009 by clubbing 22 cases viz., C.C.Nos.34 to 55 of 2009 pending trial on the file of the said Court.
3. On a complaint lodged by the Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Attayampatti Branch, the police registered a case in Crime No.68 of 2005 on 01.08.2005 for the offences under Sections 468 , 471 and 477-A IPC against Sivaraman, the petitioner herein, and after completing the investigation, filed 22 final reports viz., C.C.Nos.34 to 55 of 2009 before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.IV, Salem, fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
