A.Balaji vs The Chairman - 2020 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24197

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 24197

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
JUSTICE, J
A.Balaji – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Raja Rajan
For the Respondents: Mr.Kadirvel, Mrs.Narmadha Sampath

Table of Content
1. background of recruitment and applicant's case. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding non-disclosure of criminal case. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. importance of judicial precedents and discretion. (Para 8 , 9)

ORDER

The matter is taken up through web hearing.

2.The writ petition is filed with the following prayer;

“To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in the impugned order in Na.Ka No.A3/02600/2020 dated 09.04.2020 on the file of the fourth respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner for the post of Grade II Police Constable.”

3. The facts and circumstances necessitating the filing of the Writ Petition are briefly stated hereunder:

3.1. The first respondent Board invited applications for recruitment of Grade-II Police Constable, Jail Warder and Firemen for the year 2019. The selection process involved Written test and Physical test followed by Interview. As the petitioner appeared to have fulfilled the prescribed qualification in terms of the Notification, he had applied for consideration for appointment against the notified posts.

3.2. In response to the application of the petitioner, he was called to appear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document