Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.Saravanan, J
S.Geetha Ranjani – Appellant
Versus
The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Trichy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petitions filed for document return (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. sale deeds and pending registrations explained (Para 14 , 15 , 25 , 29 , 30) |
| 3. allegations of fraud against registrars (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 4. importance of registration under law (Para 100 , 101 , 102 , 108 , 109) |
| 5. defunct society dissolution and orders (Para 134 , 135 , 138 , 139) |
COMMON ORDER
By this common order both the writ petitions are being disposed.
2.Earlier, by two separate orders dated 05.11.2014, both the above writ petitions viz. W.P.(MD).Nos.17794 and 17795 of 2014 were disposed.
3.These present writ petitions were originally filed without impleading the 3rd respondent Kalaimaghal Sabha.
4.By the aforesaid order, the 1st and the 2nd respondents herein were directed to return the two documents and to simultaneously refer the case under section 47 A of the Indian Stamp Act for determination http://www.judis.nico.ifn the appropriate stamp duty payable by the petitioner.
5.Both these orders dated 05.11.2014 were challenged before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.260 and 1150 of 2016 by the 1st and 2nd respondents herein.
6.By a common order dated 19.09.2017, these two
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
