Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S.RAMESH, V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, JJ
A.Lakshmi Amma – Appellant
Versus
Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basis for denying compassionate appointment identified. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. correction of typographical error in the case number. (Para 3) |
| 3. court highlights importance of financial consideration and dependency. (Para 5 , 6) |
AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
Today, the matter is listed under the caption 'for being mentioned'.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is a typographical error in the year of the Writ Petition in the order dated
23.04.2025.
3. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, W.P.No.8192 of 2025 in the order dated 23.04.2025, shall be deleted and stand substituted as W.P.No.8192 of 2024
4. All other observations made in our earlier order dated 23.04.2025 shall remain intact.
[M.S.R, J.] [V.L.N, J.]
10.07.2025 N ote: R egistry is directed to issue fresh amended copy to those concerned on 11.07.2025.
Sni M.S.RAMESH, J.
and V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
Sni W.P.No.8192 of 2024
10.07.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.04.2025 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR W.P.No.8192 of 2025 A.Lakshmi Amma ...Petitioner Vs
1.Central Administrative Tribunal, Chen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
