Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.MANIKUMAR, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, JJ
The District Collector, District Collector's Office, Erode – Appellant
Versus
Tmt.Easwari – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context and parties involved in the appeal. (Para 1) |
| 2. facts leading to the filing of the writ appeal. (Para 2) |
| 3. initial application for compassionate grounds. (Para 3) |
| 4. contestation based on non-availability of vacancies. (Para 4) |
| 5. arguments in favor of the respondent. (Para 5) |
| 6. legal eligibility for compassionate appointment. (Para 6) |
| 7. guidance from government instructions on eligibility. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 8. prior applications and their context. (Para 10) |
| 9. consideration of longstanding applications. (Para 11) |
| 10. analysis of legal parameters governing compassionate appointments. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 11. final adjudication and directive. (Para 17) |
JUDGEMENT
(Order of the Court was delivered by S.MANIKUMAR, J)
Writ appeal is directed against the order made in W.P.No.28574 of 2017 dated 18.12.2017, by which the writ Court, while allowing the writ petition, directed the 1st appellant herein to provide compassionate appointment to the daughter of the writ petitioner/respondent herein, commensurating with her educational qualification within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order made in the writ petition.
2. Facts leading to th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
