Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26633
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
Supriya Sahu – Respondent
Cont.P.No.4140 of 2024 | W.P.No.8724 of 2024
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Bindran, Additional Government Pleader
No contempt found as order was not conclusive; only notice issued; ongoing writ proceedings.
Headnote:In this matter concerning Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, the petitioner sought to punish the respondents for contempt due to disobedience of a prior court order. The court found no grounds for contempt, stating that the order was merely a notice and no interim or final order had been passed. The court thus ruled that contempt had not been committed as the writ petition remained undecided. The petition is consequently closed.
7. Uma, The Chief Civil Surgeon, Office of Chief Civil Surgeon Medical Ariyalur, Government Hospital, Ariyalur - 621 704. .. Respondents Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act , 1971, to punish the respondent for the act of Contempt of Court by willful and contumacious disobedience of the order, dated 02.04.2024 passed in W.P.No.8724 of 2024 and secure compliance of the said order.
For Petitioner : Ms.E.Yukshitha, for M/s.Ramgokul Advocates and Associates For Respondents : Mr.M.Bindran, Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
This Contempt Petition is filed to punish the respondents for disobedience of the order, dated 02.04.2024 passed in W.P.No.8724 of
2024.
2. On a perusal of the order, while ordering notice of motion, this Court only summarised the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the impressions of the Court for issuing the notice of motion. This Court did not pass any interim order or final order. The Writ Petition is yet to be decided by this Court. Therefore, there is no question of any contempt being committed as against the order, dated 02.04.2024.
3. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed.
