SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26641

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
,
Accused – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N. Sudharsan
For the Respondents: G. V. Kasthuri

JUDGMENT

This Criminal Appeal is filed to set aside the Judgment of conviction dated 12.08.2015 passed in Special Case No. 7 of 2014 by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Kancheepuram at Chengalpattu.

2. The brief facts, which are necessary for the disposal of this Criminal Appeal, are as follows:-

2.1. P.W-1 is the Complainant in this case. As per the complaint under Ex.P-1, the daughter of P.W-1 the victim P.W-2 was studying in R.C School, Maduranthagam at the relevant point of time. On 18.11.2013, the Accused in this case is alleged to have come to the shop of the Complainant to purchase tooth paste. He is a neighbour also. He was having tooth brush in his hand. The Complainant P.W-1 observed that the Accused is showing some symbols and through his eyes, he is expressing something to the daughter of the Complainant. At that time, the Complainant P.W-1 was combing the hair of her daughter P.W-2. The mother of P.W-2 was in the shop which is in front of the house. Sensing something P.W-1 asked her daughter P.W-2 that what was it he was showing by gestures. For which, P.W-2 daughter of P.W-1 told her that the Accused referring him to as Anna is a bad guy he should not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top