Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J
M/s.MARG Properties Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
V.Devarajan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. enforcement orders must follow civil procedures. (Para 1 , 5) |
| 2. breach of contract led to severe penalties. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments contest the legality of the warrant. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. court allowed the civil revision petition, setting aside the warrant. (Para 7 , 8) |
O R D E R
Challenging the issuance of Non Bailable Warrant against the revision petitioner by the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (in short 'State Commission'), Chennai in E.A.No.8 of 2021 in C.C.No.263 of 2015, this Civil Revision Petition has been filed.
2. A complaint has been lodged against the revision petitioner alleging deficiency in service in non delivery of the purchased flat beyond the agreed time even after receiving the sale consideration. According to the respondent, he had booked a flat with the petitioner by paying the initial booking amount of Rs.5,00,456/- and after payment, two agreements were entered into between them, of which, one is for sale and the other one is for construction. Though the flat was to be handed over on or before 31.12.2012 and the respondent also paid the entire sale consideration, there was a breach of agreement, which forced the respond
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
