Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Nirmal Kumar, J
A.J.S Recreation and Sports Welfare Association – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks protection against police interference. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner argues entitlement to conduct activities without interference. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court emphasizes licensing requirements under specified acts. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. direction to comply with licensing requirements ordered. (Para 8) |
| 5. writ petition disposed with directives. (Para 9) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction forbearing the respondents in any way interfering with the functioning of the petitioner association in accordance with the by-laws of the association
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the club was registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975. The petitioner is running the Club to promote various facilities to their members and it is not involving in any illegal activity. According to the petitioner, the respondent Police are interfering and disturbing the lawful activities of the Club, without following any provisions of law and preventing them from doing their activities peacefully. Hence, the present Writ Petition has been filed.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that the Club was registered
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
