[Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.S.RAMESH, J.]

Challenge is made to the order of the learned Single Judge dated 10.09.2024 made in W.P.(MD)No.20829 of 2024.

2.Having granted approval of the appointment made by the respondent school, the proceedings of the appellants herein refusing to release the grant on the ground that the concerned teacher is not qualified in TET was challenged before the Writ Court. The learned Single Judge had placed reliance on the earlier decisions of this Court and held that qualification in TET is not mandatory for a minority institution and accordingly, directed the respondents to confer all the monetary benefits to the respondent school, through the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.20829 of 2024 dated 10.09.2024.

3.The Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as several decisions of the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court have been consistently taking a stand that possession of TET qualification for a teacher in a minority institution is not mandatory. The appellant herein, havin