IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J
T.Ravichandran – Appellant
Versus
The Director, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's directive for a four-month timeframe. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. outcome: disposed without costs. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned charge memo in Memo R.No. 7344120/DA/S1/2024 dated 29.05.2024 and the consequential order in R.No. 7344120/DA/S1/2024 dated 31.05.2024 issued by the first respondent and quash the same as illegal to the extent of continuing the disciplinary proceedings after the retirement and also to direct the respondents to provide the retirement benefits, along with the pension arrears with interest to the petitioner within a time stipulated by this Court.
2. Heard the learned counsel on either side.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the larger relief has been sought for by the petitioner, now, he confines the prayer that it would suffice if the disciplinary proceedings, which is pending with the respondents, is directed to be concluded within a time frame fixed by this Court.
4. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court directs the first respondent to conclude the disciplinary proceed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.