SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 28782

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, J
Deng William Ajal – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police Annamalai Nagar Police Station, Cuddalore District – Respondent
Crl.O.P.No.1611 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: No Appearance
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar

The petition to quash an FIR was denied based on substantial prima facie evidence for continuing an investigation.

Headnote:In this case, the Court assessed the validity of an FIR under Crime No.519 of 2022, with a focus on procedural integrity. The petitioner's application sought to quash the FIR, contesting its legality due to alleged incompetence and arbitrariness. The Court concluded that sufficient prima facie evidence exists, thus not warranting the quashing of the FIR. The key issue revolved around whether there were grounds to dismiss the FIR. Ultimately, the Court dismissed the petition while allowing the petitioner to pursue other legal remedies.

Table of Content
1. challenging the fir's legitimacy. (Para 1)
2. no representation for petitioner. (Para 2)
3. sufficient evidence to proceed with investigation. (Para 3)
4. final decision to dismiss petition. (Para 5)

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.1611 of 2025 Deng William Ajal ... Petitioner Vs.

The Inspector of Police Annamalai Nagar Police Station, Cuddalore District (Crime No.519 of 2022) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned FIR in Crime No.519 of 2022 dated 16.12.2022 on the file of the respondent police and quash he same as illegal, incompetent, arbitrary and against the nature of justice.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to quash the FIR in Crime No.519 of 2022 dated 16.12.2022 on the file of the respondent police as illegal, incompetent, arbitrary and against the nature of justice.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record.

3. A perusal of the FIR and materials shows that there is a prima facie material to proceed with the investigation and there is no ground to quash the FIR.

4. Therefore, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

5. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy in the manner known to law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top