Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
S.Mariappa – Appellant
Versus
The State Human Rights Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges refusal of noc. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. irc guidelines are not mandatory. (Para 6) |
| 3. court's position on prior nocs. (Para 7) |
| 4. order quashing refusal and directing issuance of noc. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. conclusion and closure of the writ petition. (Para 10) |
For R2 to R4 : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.K.Muralidharan Advocate ORDER The writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings in Ka.No:1020/2020/EvaA2, refused to grant No Objection Certificate by the respondent No.4, by its communication dated
15.07.2020, on the ground that they proposed a place to set up a Petrol- Diesel retail outlet is not fulfilled under the Rules and guidelines of “Indian Road Congress 2009” (hereinafter referred as “IRC 12-2009”)
norms.
2. In the year 2018, the respondent No.5, published the advertisement for establishment of Petrol-Diesel retail outlet in various places, as a part of rural development by Oil Marketing Companies. The petitioner applied for the same and he was granted with the dealership to establish Petrol-Diesel retail outlet. Therefore, the petitioner had purchased land comprised in S.No.573/1 situated at Pan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
