SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29691

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
M/s.P.N.Traders – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy State Tax Officer -2, Office of the State Tax Officer, Nagercoil 1 Assessment Circle, Nagercoil -629001 – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.2053 of 2025|W.M.P.(MD)Nos.1457 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.N.Sudalai Muthu
For the Respondents:Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan Government Advocate

Strict adherence to notice provisions under Section 169 of the TNGST Act is essential to uphold principles of natural justice.

Headnote:The statute in question is Section 169 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, which addresses the service of notices. The petitioner, a dealer of groceries, contended the assessment order was illegal due to improper notice. The court noted compliance with Section 169 is critical for natural justice, concluding the assessment must be quashed. The main issues included the validity of the notice served under the TNGST Act, with the court emphasizing the necessity of adhering to statutory service requirements. The final ruling quashes the assessment order, allowing the petitioner the opportunity to respond appropriately.

Table of Content
1. challenge to assessment order based on improper notice. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. argument regarding the failure to serve notice properly. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's interpretation of notice requirements under section 169. (Para 6)
4. final decision to quash assessment order and allow petitioner to respond. (Para 8)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the assessment order passed by the respondent dated 14.08.2024 for the assessment year

2019-20.

2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

3. The petitioner is dealer of exempted groceries and taxable supplies. The petitioner is filing monthly returns reporting inward and outward supplies in the prescribed GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B and paying tax after adjusting the eligible ITC, as per the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “TNGST Act” for brevity). However, the assessment order was passed by the respondent dated

14.08.2024 for the assessment year 2019-20.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner raised a specific ground that the petitioner was not served with any notice seeking explanation with regard to the alleged defects. As per Section 169 of the TNGST Act, a notice must be served in person or by registered post or to the registered e-mail ID alternatively and on failure or impracticability of adopting any of the aforesaid modes, the assessment order cannot be sustained. In support of his contention, he relied upon the judgment passed by this Court in a batch of writ petitions in WP(MD)No.26481 of

2024 etc., batch, dated 06.01.2025.

5. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent, on instructions submitted that the petitioner was served with notice through respondent portal and therefore, admittedly, the petitioner was not served notice in compliance of Section 169 of the TNGST Act.

6. It is relevant to extract the provision of Section 169 of the TNGST Act, which is as follows:-

“ Section 169 . Service of notice in certain circumstances.-

(1) Any decision, order, summons, notice or other communication under this Act or the rules made thereunder shall be served by any one of the following methods, namely:-

(a) by giving or tendering it directly or by a messenger including a courier to the addressee or the taxable person or to his manager or authorised representative or an advocate or a tax practitioner holding authority to appear in the proceedings on behalf of the taxable person or to a person regularly employed by him in connection with the business, or to any adult member of family residing with the taxable person; or (b) by registered post or speed post or courier with acknowledgement due, to the person for whom it is intended or his authorised representative, if any, at his last known place of business or residence; or (c) by sending a communication to his e-mail address provided at the time of registration or as amended from time to time; or (d) by making it available on the common portal; or (e) by publication in a newspaper circulating in the locality in which the taxable person or the person to whom it is issued is last known to have resided, carried on business or personally worked for gain; or (f) if none of the modes aforesaid is practicable, by affixing it in some conspicuous place at his last known place of business or residence and if such mode is not practicable for any reason, then by affixing a copy thereof on the notice board of the office of the concerned officer or authority who or which passed such decision or order or issued such summons or notice.

(2) Every decision, order, summons, notice or any communication shall be deemed to have been served on the date on which it is tendered or published or a copy thereof is affixed in the manner provided in sub-section (1).

(3) When such decision, order, summons, notice or any communication is sent by registered post or speed post, it shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top