2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29699
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
AN.M Associates Rep. by its Managing Director, Annam Annamalai – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Woraiyur Assessment Circle – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.2105 of 2025 | W.M.P.(MD)Nos.1483, 1485 & 1486 of 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.G.Baskar
For the Respondents:Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan Government Advocate for R1
The failure to serve notice as mandated by Section 169 of the TNGST Act invalidates the assessment order.
Headnote:This Writ Petition challenges the assessment order under the TNGST Act, citing inadequate notice as per Section 169. The Court reiterates the necessity of compliance with statutory service methods to uphold natural justice. It is determined that the assessment order cannot stand due to procedural non-compliance, warranting quashing.
Result: The assessment order is quashed, treating it as a show-cause notice.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges assessment order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. service of notice was insufficient. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. section 169's compliance ensures natural justice. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the assessment order passed by the first respondent dated 22.08.2024 for the assessment year
2019-20.
2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.
3. The petitioner is dealer of exempted groceries and taxable supplies. The petitioner is filing monthly returns reporting inward and outward supplies in the prescribed GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B and paying tax after adjusting the eligible ITC, as per the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “TNGST Act” for brevity). However, the assessment order was passed by the first respondent dated
22.08.2024 for the assessment year 2019-20.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner raised a specific ground that the petitioner was not served with any notice seeking explanation with regard to the alleged defects. As per Section 169 of the TNGST Act, a notice must be served in person or by registered post or to the registered e-mail ID alternatively and on failure or impracticability of adopting any of the aforesaid modes, the assessment order cannot be sustained. In support of his contention, he relied upon the judgment passed by this Court in a batch of writ petitions in WP(MD)No.26481 of
2024 etc., batch, dated 06.01.2025.
5. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent, on instructions submitted that the petitioner was served with notice through first respondent portal and therefore, admittedly, the petitioner was not served notice in compliance of Section 169 of the TNGST Act.
6. It is relevant to extract the provision of Section 169 of the TNGST Act, which is as follows:-
“Section 169. Service of notice in certain circumstances.-
(1) Any decision, order, summons, notice or other communication under this Act or the rules made thereunder shall be served by any one of the following methods, namely:-
(a) by giving or tendering it directly or by a messenger including a courier to the addressee or the taxable person or to his manager or authorised representative or an advocate or a tax practitioner holding authority to appear in the proceedings on behalf of the taxable person or to a person regularly employed by him in connection with the business, or to any adult member of family residing with the taxable person; or (b) by registered post or speed post or courier with acknowledgement due, to the person for whom it is intended or his authorised representative, if any, at his last known place of business or residence; or (c) by sending a communication to his e-mail address provided at the time of registration or as amended from time to time; or (d) by making it available on the common portal; or (e) by publication in a newspaper circulating in the locality in which the taxable person or the person to whom it is issued is last known to have resided, carried on business or personally worked for gain; or (f) if none of the modes aforesaid is practicable, by affixing it in some conspicuous place at his last known place of business or residence and if such mode is not practicable for any reason, then by affixing a copy thereof on the notice board of the office of the concerned officer or authority who or which passed such decision or order or issued such summons or notice.
(2) Every decision, order, summons, notice or any communication shall be deemed to have been served on the date on which it is tendered or published or a copy thereof is affixed in the manner provided in sub-section (1).
(3) When such decision, order, summons, notice or any communication is sent by registered post or speed post, it shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee at the expiry of the period normally taken by such post in transit unless the contrary is proved.”
7. The relevant